|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 283-288
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in kuwaiti sub-population
Abdullah Jassim Alenezi1, Saad Al-Nazhan2, Nassr Al-Maflehi3, Mazen A Aldosimani4
1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Farwania Dental, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
2 Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences and Biostatistics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4 Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||11-Jan-2022|
|Date of Decision||24-Feb-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||24-Feb-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||1-Sep-2022|
Prof. Saad Al-Nazhan
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, P. O. Box: 84891, Riyadh 11681
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: C-shaped root canal anatomical variations cause challenges in endodontics treatment. This study investigated the prevalence of C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in the Kuwaiti population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: CBCT images of sound mature mandibular second molars of 247 Kuwaiti patients were collected from government dental centers. An endodontist and radiologist examined the images to determine the presence of C-shaped canals. They were evaluated at four levels (canal orifice, coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root). Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results: One hundred and forty-nine scans and 199 teeth belonging to 62 males and 87 females aged 16–56 years were included. C-shaped canals were found in 26 (13.07%) cases and were more common in females. Females were more likely to have bilateral C-shaped canals (P < 0.05). C2 was the most frequent morphology type at the orifice and coronal levels (53.9%) and apical levels (38.5%). An uninterrupted “C” shape was seen in 4 teeth (15.39%). A lingual longitudinal groove with the buccal notch (groove Type II) was seen in 14 teeth (53.85%).
Conclusion: The prevalence of C-shaped canals in the mandibular second molars of a Kuwaiti population was higher than studies performed in the Middle-East population. The morphology type of C-shaped canal in mandibular second molars varied between the root levels. Radicular groove with buccal notches was most frequently located on the lingual side.
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography, C-shaped canal, mandibular second molar, radicular groove, root canal morphology
|How to cite this article:|
Alenezi AJ, Al-Nazhan S, Al-Maflehi N, Aldosimani MA. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in kuwaiti sub-population. Saudi Endod J 2022;12:283-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Alenezi AJ, Al-Nazhan S, Al-Maflehi N, Aldosimani MA. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in kuwaiti sub-population. Saudi Endod J [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 5];12:283-8. Available from: https://www.saudiendodj.com/text.asp?2022/12/3/283/354824
| Introduction|| |
The primary objective of endodontic treatment is debridement and disinfection of the root canals. A lack of knowledge of root canal morphology may lead to incomplete chemomechanical debridement and failure of root canal treatment. C-shaped canal is one of the most common variations of canal morphology that can be seen along the root length and in some cases may present a thin lingual canal wall. This type of anatomy might require several adjustments on the traditional clinical approach for better outcome results.
Although a C-shaped canal typically occurs in the mandibular second molars, it has also been identified in other teeth, including the maxillary molars and mandibular premolars.
Hertwig's epithelial root sheath controls the radicular morphogenesis which determines the number and shape of the roots. The epithelial sheath curves in a horizontal plane below the cementoenamel junction and fuses in the center, leaving openings for roots. Failure of the epithelial sheath to fuse on the buccal or lingual root surface creates a C-shaped root, containing a C-shaped canal that may appear at any portion of the root canal length. A C-shaped root may also develop because of the coalescence of roots due to cementum deposition.
Melton et al. classified C-shaped canals based on their cross-sectional shape, but the differences between categories II and III were not clear. Fan et al. used microcomputed tomography and modified Melton's method to analyze the morphology of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. According to Fan et al., C1 classification was the most common configuration.
A preoperative conventional radiograph is the only noninvasive method to detect canal morphology., Due to its two-dimensional nature and image superimposition, some experts believe that radiographic detection of the complexity of the root canal morphology is not reliable, and the presence of C-shaped canals can only be confirmed during direct access of the pulp chamber.,
The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been recently increased in dentistry due to its higher accuracy compared to conventional radiographs. Moreover, it can easily diagnose the complex morphology of the teeth such as C-shaped canals and grooves and notches of the external surface of the root.
Several studies of C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars using CBCT have reported a prevalence of 3.5%–48.7%.,,,,,,,,, These studies were conducted in several countries of different ethnicity. The data obtained from these studies may not be applicable in all geographic regions. To date, no study has explored the prevalence of C-shaped root canals in a Kuwaiti population. Therefore, the present study was performed to investigate the prevalence of C-shaped canals in the mandibular second molars of a Kuwaiti population using CBCT and compared with those that occurred in other population.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Riyadh Elm University (FPGRP/2020/523/408/401), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
A total of 247 CBCT images of mandibular second molars were collected from the radiology departments of four government dental centers in Kuwait. These CBCT scans were performed between January 2019 and September 2020 for various diagnostic purposes. Teeth were selected for inclusion if they belonged to a Kuwaiti citizen aged 16–65 years, had closed root apices, and did not have prior root canal treatment, periapical lesions, resorption, or canal calcification. Only high-quality CBCT images depicting the complete arch or limited view were included. The correlation of age and gender of patients and the tooth position in relation to the frequency of C-shaped canal were determined.
The CBCT images were retrospectively analyzed by two experienced examiners, an Endodontist and an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, using On-Demand 3D software (Cybermed Inc., Seoul, Korea). Axial, coronal, and sagittal two-dimensional images were displayed on a 32-inch monitor (Hewlett-Packard, California, USA) with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels. Images were carefully analyzed in a dark room after adjusting the magnification and contrast. Examiner alignment was performed to improve inter-examiner reliability, and inter-and intra-examiner reliability was evaluated using statistical methods.
Using the method described by Martins et al., we evaluated the CBCT axial reconstructed images for the presence of C-shaped canals in the mandibular second molars at the cross-sectional levels of canal orifices and coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root. The morphology of C-shaped canals was classified according to Fan et al. as follows:
(1) Class I (C1): An interrupted continuous canal of C-shaped cross-section. (2) Class II (C2): Discontinues “semicolon” C-shaped canal configuration. (3) Class III (C3): 2–3 separated canals presented. (4) Class IV (C4): Single round or oval-shaped canal. (5) Class V (C5): No canal lumen is visible.
The C-shaped canals were further classified based on the presence of the radicular groove according to the classification proposed by Shemesh et al. into five categories:
(1) Category 1: Lingual groove only. (2) Category 2: Lingual groove and buccal notch. (3) Category 3: Buccal groove only. (4) Category 4: Buccal groove and lingual notch. (5) Category 5: No groove.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 22 (IBM, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. The prevalence of C-shaped canals with respect to age, sex, and tooth position was also evaluated using the Chi-square-test. Inter- and intra-examiner agreements were evaluated using the Kappa statistic.
| Results|| |
A high inter- and intra-examiner agreement for the CBCT reporting (Kappa coefficient 0.96) was observed. Of the 247 CBCT scans identified, 149 met the inclusion criteria and 98 were excluded. The 149 included CBCT scans were from 62 males and 87 females aged 16–56 years. A total of 199 mandibular second molars (103 right-sided and 96 left-sided) were evaluated. There was no difference among gender (P > 0.764) or age (P > 0.35) groups [Table 1]. A C-shaped canal was observed in 26 scans (13.07%) and was more common in scans of females than males [17 vs. 9 cases, respectively; [Table 2]]. No significant differences were observed in the presence of C-shaped canals between sides (P > 0.127) or in bilateral (P > 0.697) between both genders.
|Table 1: Distribution of the evaluated teeth in relation to age of patients in the four dental centers|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Distribution of unilateral and bilateral occurrences of C-shaped canals amongst patients|
Click here to view
[Table 3] lists the cross-sectional shape of C-shaped canals at different root levels. C2 type morphology was observed in 53.9% of scans at the orifice and coronal levels and in 38.5% of scans at the apical level [Figure 1]. An uninterrupted “C” shape was observed in 4 teeth [15.39%; [Figure 2]]. No significant difference was observed in the cross-sectional canal shape between different levels (P > 0.311). Moreover, a buccal notch was observed in 14 teeth (53.85%) with a lingual longitudinal groove (groove Type II), and a longitudinal groove (groove Type I) was observed in 6 teeth (23.08%). The difference in groove types was statistically significant [P < 0.0001; [Table 4] and [Figure 1]].
|Figure 1: Cone-beam computed tomography axial section of bilateral C-shaped canal of mandibular right and left second molar at different levels with different canal configuration as shown in the canal orifice (a), coronal (b), mid-root (c) and apical (d). Notice the lingual groove with buccal notch of the left molar (arrow)|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Cone-beam computed tomography axial section of bilateral C-shaped canal of right mandibular second molar with an uninterrupted “C” shape (C1) canal at different levels; the canal orifice (a), coronal (b), mid-root (c) and apical (d)|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Cross-sectional canal shapes of C-shaped canals at different levels|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Prevalence distribution of radicular groove in mandibular second molars with C-shaped canals (Shemesh et al., 2017 classification)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This retrospective study is the first statistical report investigating the prevalence of C-shaped canal morphology in permanent mandibular second molars of the Kuwaiti population. For this reason, the current study used a CBCT imaging database from patients of a Kuwaiti specialized dental centers. It is more sensitive than clinical and conventional radiographic examination in providing an excellent nondestructive and noninvasive image that detects most of the anatomic variations of the external and internal dental anatomy. In addition, the use of CBCT to detect the location of C-shaped canals may help to avoid creating problems during the endodontic treatment.
C-shaped canal is unique anatomical configuration. It is very common in mandibular second molars because of their higher incidence of root fusion. In our study, the prevalence of C-shaped canal in the mandibular second molar was 13.07%, which is higher than that of the Middle-Eastern population.,, Although all previous studies used CBCT to evaluate the canal morphology, they differed in terms of sample size and definition and classification of C-shaped canal. These differences may explain the higher prevalence of C-shaped morphology in our study. The prevalence of C-shaped morphology reported by Janani et al. in an Iranian study was slightly higher than us (15.3%) and other studies of the Middle East. The apparent reason was that the prevalence was presented as a percentage of grand totals in molars. In addition, studies including Malaysian (48.7%), German (73.3%), Korean (32.7%–44.5%), and Chinese (41.27%) populations,,,, reported higher prevalence. In these studies, the prevalence of C-shaped canal in the second molar was presented in comparison with that of the other teeth. Differences in the results of the present and previous studies may be due to differences in sample size, classification system, and method of evaluation.
We found that the C-shaped canals were more often unilateral than bilateral, similar to the results of studies conducted by Wu et al., Alfawaz et al., and Shemesh et al. We observed no difference in the prevalence of C-shaped canal between both sides, similar to the studies of Kim et al. in Koreans and Zheng et al. in a Chinese population. Although we did not find the marked difference of bilateral C-shaped canals among genders, some researchers advise caution to clinicians performing endodontic treatment of homologous molars to rule out bilateral C-shaped canal. This difference in our findings is probably a result of variation in sample size and ethnic background.
In our study, we found C-shaped canals more frequently in females than males, similar to the results of most previous studies.,,,, This might be related to different morphology and development in men and women, including a smaller jaw and larger teeth in women. However, some studies have found no gender differences.,,, The gender differences should be interpreted with caution, especially in studies where the study participants have more females than males or there is a difference in ethnicity between males and females.
The CBCT images were divided into five groups based on patient age. C-shaped canals were observed most frequently in individuals aged 26–35 years (11 of 26 scans, 42.3%) than in the older age group. In contrast, Nejaim et al. found C-shaped canals to be most common in patients aged 15–24 years, but found no differences between age groups in the logistic regression (P > 0.05). The considerable volume of the root canal and pulp chamber are inversely proportional to age due to secondary dentin formation throughout life, which may eventually resulted in almost total pulp obliteration. This might naturally influence the type of the C-canal to vary appreciably at various levels. Martin et al. concluded based on a systemic review and meta-analysis that age did not influence the prevalence of C-shaped canals.
The most common type observed in the present study was C2. In contrast, Al-Fouzan reported that C3 was the most common type, while C1 was reported by Fan et al. and Tassoker and Sener. Similar to the method described by Zheng et al., we evaluated the mandibular second molars at four root levels, including canal orifice and coronal, middle, and apical third of the root. Only a few previous studies have done that. Type C1, 2, and 3 were seen at all root levels while C4 was observed in the middle and apical levels only. Results of the current study differ slightly from those of Aricioğlu et al. who found C3 to be the most common type of canal morphology (28.1%). We found that the most common morphology type in the apical region was C1 (26.5%); in the middle region C2 (32.2%) and in the coronal region it was C3 (43.4%). The differences in these results were due to differences in sample size and studied population. In addition, Zheng et al. found that the frequency of C1 and C2 types decreased from the orifice to the apical region, whereas that of C3 and C4 increased.
In the current study, it was noticed that the most frequent type of radicular groove was Type II (lingual groove and buccal notch) followed by Type I (longitudinal groove). Similar findings were reported by Shemesh et al. and Kim et al. Although the study by Chen et al. cannot be directly compared with our study, they found the radicular groove in 69% of cases, more commonly in the lingual half. Care should be taken to avoid root perforation during instrumentation technique as the danger zone is located in the mesiolingual direction.
The present study had a small sample size due to the limited number of specialized government dental centers (four) in Kuwait which was considered a limitation of the study. A future study with larger sample sizes is needed to represent the population better. In addition, ex vivo micro-computed tomography technique may acquire high-resolution images for evaluating tiny anatomical details.
| Conclusion|| |
The prevalence of C-shaped canal in the mandibular second molar in a Kuwaiti population was relatively high (13.07%). It is more common in females than males and more likely to be bilateral than unilateral. Their anatomical configuration varies across different root levels which makes it difficult to clean, fill, and restore. Radicular groove with buccal notches was most frequently located on the lingual side.
The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/Yo4M5U.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Friedman S. Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endod Topics 2002;2:59-88.
Karabucak B, Bunes A, Chehoud C, Kohli MR, Setzer F. Prevalence of apical periodontitis in endodontically treated premolars and molars with untreated canal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J Endod 2016;42:538-41.
Kato A, Ziegler A, Higuchi N, Nakata K, Nakamura H, Ohno N. Aetiology, incidence and morphology of the C-shaped root canal system and its impact on clinical endodontics. Int Endod J 2014;47:1012-33.
Martins JN, Mata A, Marques D, Anderson C, Caramês J. Prevalence and characteristics of the maxillary C-shaped molar. J Endod 2016;42:383-9.
Alenezi DJ, Al-Nazhan SA, Al-Maflehi N, Soman C. Root and canal morphology of mandibular premolar teeth in a kuwaiti subpopulation: A CBCT clinical study. Eur Endod J 2020;5:248-56.
Luder HU. Malformations of the tooth root in humans. Front Physiol 2015;6:307.
Manning SA. Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II. C-shaped canals. Int Endod J 1990;23:40-5.
Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod 1991;17:384-8.
Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I – Anatomical features. J Endod 2004;30:899-903.
Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Fan W. C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part II – Radiographic features. J Endod 2004;30:904-8.
De Moor RJ. C-shaped root canal configuration in maxillary first molars. Int Endod J 2002;35:200-8.
Lambrianidis T, Lyroudia K, Pandelidou O, Nicolaou A. Evaluation of periapical radiographs in the recognition of C-shaped mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:458-62.
Shemesh A, Levin A, Katzenell V, Itzhak JB, Levinson O, Avraham Z, et al.
C-shaped canals-prevalence and root canal configuration by cone beam computed tomography evaluation in first and second mandibular molars – A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2039-44.
Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AV, Haiter-Neto F, Cohenca N. Evaluation of root canal configuration of mandibular molars in a Brazilian population by using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vivo
study. J Endod 2013;39:849-52.
Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alkhayyal AK, Almobarak AA, Alhusain MF, Martins JN. Prevalence of C-shaped canal system in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population assessed via cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:107-12.
Jin GC, Lee SJ, Roh BD. Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod 2006;32:10-3.
Martins JN, Mata A, Marques D, Caramês J. Prevalence of C-shaped mandibular molars in the Portuguese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2016;10:529-35.
] [Full text]
Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Sinanoglu A. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in a Turkish subpopulation: A retrospective study. Int Endod J 2013;46:1032-8.
Wang Y, Guo J, Yang HB, Han X, Yu Y. Incidence of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in the native Chinese population by analysis of clinical methods. Int J Oral Sci 2012;4:161-5.
Rahimi S, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Zand V, Abdolrahimi M, Es'haghi R. Root canal configuration and the prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci 2008;50:9-13.
Janani M, Rahimi S, Jafari F, Johari M, Nikniaz S, Ghasemi N. Anatomic features of C-shaped mandibular second molars in a selected Iranian population using CBCT. Iran Endod J 2018;13:120-5.
Pan JY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:14.
Cleghorn BM, Goodacre CJ, Christie WH. Morphology of teeth and their root canal systems. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, editors. Ingle's Endodontics. 6th
ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008. p. 151-220.
Woelber JP, Bruder M, Tennert C, Wrbas KT. Assessment of endodontic treatment of c-shaped root canals. Swiss Dent J 2014;124:11-5.
Seo MS, Park DS. C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars in a Korean population: Clinical observation and in vitro
analysis. Int Endod J 2004;37:139-44.
Wu YC, Cathy Tsai YW, Cheng WC, Weng PW, Su CC, Chiang HS, et al.
Relationship of the incidence of C-shaped root canal configurations of mandibular first premolars with distolingual roots in mandibular first molars in a Taiwanese population: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2018;44:1492-9.e1.
Kim HS, Jung D, Lee H, Han YS, Oh S, Sim HY. C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars in a Korean population: A CBCT analysis. Restor Dent Endod 2018;43:e42.
Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Tang L, et al.
C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011;44:857-62.
Vaz de Azevedo KR, Lopes CB, Andrade RH, Pacheco da Costa FF, Gonçalves LS, Medeiros Dos Santos R, et al.
C-shaped canals in first and second mandibular molars from Brazilian individuals: A prevalence study using cone-beam computed tomography. PLoS One 2019;14:e0211948.
Tassoker M, Sener S. Analysis of the root canal configuration and C-shaped canal frequency of mandibular second molars: A cone beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018;77:752-7.
Pawar AM, Pawar M, Kfir A, Singh S, Salve P, Thakur B, et al.
Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molar teeth of an Indian population: An in vivo
cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:2801-9.
Aricioğlu B, Tomrukçu DN, Köse TE. Taurodontism and C-shaped anatomy: Is there an association? Oral Radiol 2021;37:443-51.
Nejaim Y, Gomes AF, Rosado LP, Freitas DQ, Martins JN, da Silva EJ. C-shaped canals in mandibular molars of a Brazilian subpopulation: Prevalence and root canal configuration using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:3299-305.
Martins JN, Marques D, Silva EJ, Caramês J, Mata A, Versiani MA. Prevalence of C-shaped canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography – A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2019;52:1556-72.
Al-Fouzan KS. C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi Arabian population. Int Endod J 2002;35:499-504.
Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim Y. Mandibular second molar root canal morphology and variants in a Korean subpopulation. Int Endod J 2016;49:136-44.
Chen YC, Tsai CL, Chen YC, Chen G, Yang SF. A cone-beam computed tomography study of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second premolars in a Taiwan Chinese subpopulation. J Formos Med Assoc 2018;117:1086-92.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]