Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 476
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 221-227

Efficacy of SmearOFF, maleic acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid combined with sodium hypochlorite in removal of smear layer from curved root canals: In vitro study


Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nidambur Vasudev Ballal
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_150_20

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Mechanical instrumentation of the root canal system produces an amorphous smear layer. The aim of the present research was to assess the effect of SmearOFF, 7% maleic acid (MA) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) when combined with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in removal of smear layer from curved root canals. Materials and Methods: Forty mandibular molars were selected of which only the mesial roots were prepared biomechanically and categorized into four equal groups on the basis of the irrigation protocol: (1) SmearOFF, (2) 7% MA, (3) 17% EDTA, and (4) 0.9% saline. Teeth were then decoronated; mesial roots were cleaved lengthwise and scanning electron microscopic analysis was performed for evaluation of existence of smear layer. Results: On intergroup comparison, there has been found to be notable dissimilarity among the SmearOFF and MA groups in coronal, middle and apical thirds of the root canal system (P > 0.05). However, in EDTA group, there was no notable difference in coronal and middle third. However, in apical one-third, smear layer was cleared less effectively when compared to SmearOFF and MA (P < 0.001). In contrary, all of saline group specimens were extensively smeared in all the parts of the root canal system. On intergroup comparison, all the test irrigants removed smear layer effectively in coronal and middle third of the root canal. Nonetheless, in apical portion, SmearOFF, and MA effectuated significantly better compared to EDTA. Conclusion: In combination with NaOCl, SmearOFF, and MA had superlative smear layer eradication efficacy in contrast to EDTA in apical third of the curved root canals.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed120    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal