Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 626
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 202-213

Awareness and endodontic clinical practice of the general dental practitioners in Albaha region


1 Restorative Dental Science Department, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia
2 Dental Health Department, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia
3 Albaha Dental Center, MOH, Albaha, Saudi Arabia
4 Psychology Department, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission15-Apr-2020
Date of Decision09-May-2020
Date of Acceptance17-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication8-May-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohammed Serhan A. Alserhan
Department of Endodontics, Albaha University, Albaha
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_81_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the awareness and clinical practice of the general dental practitioners (GDPs) regarding endodontic treatment in Albaha region, Saudi Arabia.
Materials and Methods: An e-questionnaire was distributed among the GDPs in Albaha Province. The e-questionnaire was composed of 21 questions that assessed the awareness and the clinical practice of the GDPs regarding endodontic treatment. The data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results: Fifty-seven (81.42%) out of 70 GDPs responded to the distributed e-questionnaire. Most of the respondents were practicing endodontics on molars (82.4%). A significant difference was observed in performing retreatment between the practitioners who worked in the private sector than peers who worked in the governmental sector (P = 0.015). Noticeably, almost 60% of the participated dentists were not using rubber dam isolation regularly for endodontic procedures. Furthermore, only about 50% of them used cold test for pulpal diagnosis, while 3.5% used electric pulp tester. Few were using intracanal medicament and follow the patients after completing the treatment.
Conclusions: A clear deficiency in some aspects of the awareness and clinical endodontic practice of the GDPs in Albaha region was observed. The international and national guidelines of endodontic practice should be implemented.

Keywords: Awareness, endodontic practice, general dentist, knowledge, Saudi Arabia


How to cite this article:
Alserhan MA, Alzahrani AH, Alzahrani AS, Alzahrani SS. Awareness and endodontic clinical practice of the general dental practitioners in Albaha region. Saudi Endod J 2021;11:202-13

How to cite this URL:
Alserhan MA, Alzahrani AH, Alzahrani AS, Alzahrani SS. Awareness and endodontic clinical practice of the general dental practitioners in Albaha region. Saudi Endod J [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 17];11:202-13. Available from: https://www.saudiendodj.com/text.asp?2021/11/2/202/315655


  Introduction Top


The endodontic treatment's primary objective is to preserve the natural teeth with health status and acceptable function. Furthermore, outcomes of the root canal treatment are affected by variable prognostic factors.[1] One of the most important prognostic factors are the dentist-related factors which include the level of canals disinfection, the quality of coronal and radicular fillings, procedure mishaps, and the use of innovative endodontic technologies by the dentists according to their skills and knowledge.[1],[2]

Therefore, to confirm adequate root canal treatment outcomes, endodontic clinical practice and undergraduate curriculum guidelines have been issued by governmental health services and endodontic societies.[3],[4],[5] Furthermore, numerous researches have been conducted to investigate the compliance of dental practitioners in the implementation of these guidelines.[6],[7],[8],[9] Unfortunately, these researches show the unpredictable compliance of the practitioners with endodontic guidelines.

In consequence, the failure rate of the root canal treatment performed by the general dental practitioners (GDPs) is higher than previously reported in general practice.[10],[11],[12] This variability in the outcomes may reflect a difference in the technical quality of the root canal treatment performed.

Several studies have investigated the variable aspects of the endodontic practice performed by the GDPs at national or international levels.[6],[7],[8],[9] However, to the best of our knowledge, no such study had been conducted in Albaha region. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the awareness and clinical practice of the GDPs regarding endodontic treatment protocols in Albaha region.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Education, Training Center and Academic Affairs at the Saudi Ministry of Health “Albaha branch” (approval number 091019).

A Google Forms e-questionnaire was designed as a modified version of the e-questionnaire that was developed by Bogari et al. in 2019.[8] The e-questionnaire was composed of 6 demographic items and 21 questions that assessed six items related to the clinical endodontic practice of GDPs in Albaha region. The e-questionnaire link was distributed among GDPs as a text message. The title and the purpose of the conducted study were included in the e-questionnaire. Furthermore, the agreement consent of the participants was included in the e-questionnaire. The answers “data” were tabulated in an Excel sheet and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 22 (Armonk, New York, USA). A Chi-square test was used to evaluate the relationship between categorical variables, where P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.


  Results Top


A total of 57 GDPs (81.42%) out of 70 in Albaha region responded to the distributed e-questionnaire. Among the total respondents, 47.4% were graduated from governmental schools and 52.6% from private schools. Most of the participants (61%) were of experience <5 years. The demographic information of the participants is presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the participants

Click here to view


Case difficulty assessment

The findings of this study showed that the majority of the GDPs did root canal treatment on molars (n = 47, 82.45%). The nationality and working sector were the only demographic characteristics that had significant effects on the performance, P = 0.29 and 0.048, respectively.

Moreover, a significant difference was observed in performing retreatment between the GDPs who worked in the private sector than peers who worked in the governmental sector (57.89% vs. 39.47%; P = 0.015). Yet, almost half of the GDPs reported that they retreated failing cases regularly (n = 26, 45.6%).

It is noteworthy that 42.85% of the non-Saudi participants and 40.9% of those who have experienced more than 5 years are less likely to refer cases to the endodontist. The difference was significant for both P = 0.048 and 0.045, respectively. [Table 2] summarizes the case difficulty assessment.
Table 2: Case difficulty assessment responses

Click here to view


Patient's safety and infection control

The results of this study revealed a clear variation in the implementation of patient's safety and infection control protocol. In this respect, only 28.07% of the participating practitioners take consent form before the procedure. Significantly, the non-Saudi GDPs and those with more than 5 years' experience were more frequently obtaining consent form than other peers (P = 0.12 and 0.034, respectively).

The majority of the respondents (78.9%) take full medical history for their patients. Only 40.3% of the respondents use the rubber dam isolation regularly.

Most of the respondents (87.71%) consider changing handpiece after each patient as part of the dental practice policy. [Table 3] describes the GDPs' practices in relation to patient's safety and infection control.
Table 3: Patient's safety and infection control general dental practitioners' responses

Click here to view


Diagnosis

49.12% of the participants regularly use the cold test for pulpal diagnosis, while 3.5% of them use the electric pulp tester (EPT) for pulp diagnosis.

75.43% of the practitioners take preoperative radiographs. [Table 4] describes the usage of the basic endodontic diagnostic tools by the GDPs in Albaha.
Table 4: Responses of the participants to the diagnostic items

Click here to view


Working length

The majority of the practitioners (75.43%) are using apex locators for working length determination slightly more than the use of periapical radiographs (71.9%).

Females and younger age group use the tactile sensation more frequently than the others. The difference was significant, P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively, as shown in [Table 5].
Table 5: Responses of the general dental practitioners regarding working length determinations techniques

Click here to view


Root canal disinfection

Only very few responses (8.7%) indicate the practice of leaving the tooth open, the majority (80%) of them were practicing in private sector, and all of them have experienced more than 5 years. The majority of the respondents (68.42%) prefer to leave the canals empty between visits.

The majority of the respondents (85.96%) prefer to use sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. However, only 45.61% of them use EDTA for irrigation.

82.45% of the respondents use rotary files for root canal preparation, as shown in [Table 6].
Table 6: Responses of the general dental practitioners regarding root canal disinfection items

Click here to view


Obturation and follow-up

64.91% of the practitioners take a periapical radiograph for the master cone before they proceed with obturation. Moreover, 84.21% of the participants are taking a postoperative radiograph to assess the obturation. Only 28.07% of the respondents follow up their endodontic cases regularly. [Table 7] illustrates GDPs' responses in relation to obturation and follow-up in endodontic care.
Table 7: Responses of the general dental practitioners to obturation and follow-up items

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Several studies have shown a low success rate of the root canal therapy performed by the GDPs compared to endodontically specialized dentists.[11],[12] Moreover, several national and international epidemiological studies have shown a high percentage of poor-quality root canal treatment performed by the general dentist.[13],[14],[15] Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the awareness and attitude of the GDPs toward clinical endodontic practice in Albaha region.

Assessment of the case difficulty is recommended to ensure proper management of the case. To prevent treatment complications, dentists should know their abilities and consider referral depending on endodontic case difficulty assessment.[3] The Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia clearly identified the endodontic procedures that can be carried out by the GDPs.[5] Yet, the majority of the respondents in this study perform root canal treatment for molars (82.45%), and 94.73% of the private sector practitioners do root canal retreatment for the failing cases. This is partially in agreement with the other national survey in which 73.3% of the GDPs are performing root canal treatment for molars.[8] The reported ignorance of the practitioners toward the case assessment difficulty and referral protocols in this study could be attributed to the awareness level or to financial reasons.

Treatment outcome progression is proportional to the adherence to the regulations and precautions of patient safety protocols.[16] Thereby, the rubber dam application is essential for the safety of the patients and the dentist and to improve the outcome of endodontic treatment.[8] Madarati et al. investigated the preferences and experiences of patients using rubber dam isolation during root canal treatment among the residents of Almadina Almunnawra, Saudi Arabia. They found that the majority of participants would prefer to use it in their next session.[17] The results of the present study showed that only 40.35% of the respondents apply rubber dam routinely for endodontic isolation. It is lower than the findings of Savani et al.,[7] Bogari et al.,[8] and Al-Abdulwahhab et al.[18] and higher than Mathew and Al Nafea[6] and Iqbal et al.[9] Partially, this might explain the low success rate of endodontic treatment in the epidemiological studies.[13],[14],[15]

Pulpal and periapical diagnosis could be a complicated mission sometimes. Therefore, various assessment methods are usually required for proper endodontic diagnosis.[19] The thermal pulp test and EPT have been frequently used for pulpal diagnosis. Unfortunately, in this study, half of the GDPs use the cold test and only 3.5% of them used EPT to confirm the pulpal diagnosis. Similar findings were reported by Bogari et al.[8] Mathew and Al Nafea reported a high percentage of GPDs who never do a pulp test.[6] This will inversely affect the accuracy of the pulpal diagnosis, and treatment might be performed on the wrong tooth.

Furthermore, taking clear preoperative periapical radiographs is essential for case assessment, diagnosis, and follow-up.[9],[14] High percentages of the practitioners (75.43%) in this study take a preoperative periapical radiograph routinely before the procedure. This percentage is in agreement with a study conducted also in Saudi Arabia, where they reported a higher percentage.[5],[8] However, it is in contrast to a similar study conducted in the city of Riyadh, where they reported a (27%) taking preoperative radiographs.[6] Performing root canal treatment without radiographically checking the tooth is below the standard of care. Endodontic guidelines should be followed for better outcome results.[3],[4],[5]

Working length determination is a crucial step in root canal treatment. Although tactile sensation is not accurate method for root canal length determination,[20] about 32% of the practitioners still practicing tactile sensation for working length determination. Interestingly, 61.11% of the practitioners using tactile sensation were female practitioners; the difference between genders was significant (P = 0.005). This finding which is in agreement with Mathew and Al Nafea study in Riyadh city might be attributed to the shortage of the supply and maintenance of the required machines and instruments in some clinics.[6] Eikenberg and Vandre reported that the use of tactile sensation for working length determination gives varied measurements over different patients because of canal patency and curvatures.[21] Electric apex locator is currently considered the best method of determining the working length in vital and necrotic pulp.[22]

An effective irrigation solution combined with the effective application method enhances the root canal treatment outcome.[23] Because of sodium hypochlorite antimicrobial activity, low viscosity, ability to dissolve pulp tissues, lubrication action, and availability, it is considered to be the most frequently used endodontic irrigant.[24] The results of this study reported more practitioners using sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation compared to other national studies.[6],[8],[25]

In contrast to the finding of Bogari et al.[8] regarding the usage of intracanal medicaments in particular calcium hydroxide, in which 60.6% of the GDPs reported using of intracanal medicament, only 31.57% of the participants in this study use it. Similar findings were reported by Mathew and Al Nafea[6] and Albahiti.[25] An optimal antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide was reported when direct contact with microorganisms was achieved.[26] Furthermore, an application of calcium hydroxide for 7 days is sufficient to reduce bacteria in the root canal.[27]

The majority of the respondents (82.45%) in this study used rotary files for root canal preparation, which is higher than Mathew and Al Nafea[6] findings. The introduction of nickel–titanium had revolutionized the endodontic technique. It provides consistent canal shapes, good centering, and faster preparation time.[28] This high use of nickel–titanium instruments among the GDPs might be due to the frequent exposure and availability of hands-on courses.

Despite the importance of the postobturation periapical radiograph, about 16% of the practitioners in this study do not regularly take postobturation radiograph. Furthermore, only 61% of them take a periapical radiograph for the master cone before the obturation. This is much less than Bogari et al. finding.[8] Postobturation radiograph should be taken in order to ensure that the root canal filling was carried out adequately. Patel and Saunders reported that at least one postoperative radiograph is necessary to assess the success of the root canal filling.[29] They consider this radiograph as a baseline for assessment of apical pathology or healing.

A periodic follow-up of the root canal treatment is an integral part of the proper case management to assure successful outcomes.[30],[31] However, only 28.07% of the participants in this study follow up their cases regularly. This finding is similar to the finding of Bogari et al.[8] and in contrast with Jamleh et al. study in which they reported 84% of the respondents routinely perform regular recall with their patients.[31] The difference in results was related to the number of respondents.

The small number of GDPs in Albaha region is the main limitation of this study. Since not all of them participated in this study, the statistical correlation between the different categorical variables might be affected.


  Conclusions Top


A clear deficiency in some aspects of the awareness and clinical practice of the GDPs in Albaha region was observed in this study. Furthermore, several demographic characteristics have shown to influence the endodontic practice. Therefore, it is important to increase the awareness of the GDPs regarding the international and national endodontic practice guidelines.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: Part 1: Periapical health. Int Endod J 2011;44:583-609.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Friedman S, Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy-healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32:493-503.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
American association of Endodontics. Guide to clinical Endodontics.Available from: https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/guide-clinical-endodontics. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 02]  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
De Moor R, Hulsmann M, Kirkevang LL, Tanalp J, Whitworth J. Undergraduate curriculum guidelines for endodontology. Int Endod J 2013;46:1105-14.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Minstry of Health at Saudi Arabia. Regulation of Dental Services. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Rules/Documents/010.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Feb 02]  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mathew S, Al Nafea M. An evaluation of the current endodontic trends among the general dental practitioners and specialist in Riyadh, KSA. Int J Innov Educ Res 2015;3:8-19.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: Report of a United States national survey. J Endo 2014;40:618-24.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bogari DF, Alzebiani NA, Mansouri RM, Aljiaid FG, Alghamdi MA, Almalki M, et al. The knowledge and attitude of general dental practitioners toward the proper standards of care while managing endodontic patients in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Endod J 2019;9:40-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Iqbal A, Akbar I, Qureshi B, Sghaireen MG, Al-Omiri MK. A survey of standard protocols for endodontic treatment in north of KSA. ISRN Dent 2014;4:865780.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Tilashalski KR, Gilbert GH, Boykin MJ, Shelton BJ. Root canal treatment in a population-based adult sample: Status of teeth after endodontic treatment. J Endod 2004;30:577-81.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bernstein SD, Horowitz AJ, Man M, Wu H, Foran D, Vena DA, et al. Outcomes of endodontic therapy in general practice: a study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:478-87.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Burry JC, Stover S, Eichmiller F, Bhagavatula P. Outcomes of primary endodontic therapy provided by endodontic specialists compared with other providers. J Endod 2016; 42:702-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Al-Nazhan SA, Alsaeed SA, Al-Attas HA, Dohaithem AJ, Al-Serhan MS, Al-Maflehi NS. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and quality of root canal treatment in an adult Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2017;38:413-21.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alfouzan K, Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Alzahrani M, Alhezaimi K. Radiographic diagnosis of periapical status and quality of root canal fillings in a saudi arabian subpopulation. Oral Health Prev Dent 2016;14:241-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Siqueira JF Jr., Rocas IN, Alves FR, Campos LC. Periradicular status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root canal fillings in a Brazilian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:369-74.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Yamalik N, Van Dijk W. Analysis of the attitudes and needs/demands of dental practitioners in the field of patient safety and risk management. Int Dent J 2013;63:291-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Madarati A, Abid S, Tamimi F, Ezzi A, Sammani A, Shaar M, et al. Dental-dam for infection control and patient safety during clinical endodontic treatment: Preferences of dental patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:2012.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Al-Abdulwahhab BM, Al-Thabit H, Al-Harthi A, Shamina R, Al-Ashgai A, Al-Qabbani F, et al. The attitudes of dental interns to the use of the rubber dam at Riyadh dental colleges. Saudi Endod J 2012;2:75-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
  [Full text]  
19.
Chen E, Abbott PV. Dental pulp testing: A review. Int J Dent 2009; 12:365785.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sharma MC, Arora V. Determination of working length of root canal. Med J 2010;66:231-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Eikenberg LT, Vandre CO. Comparison of digital dentalX-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination. J Endod 2000;26:65-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Dunlap C, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998;24:48-50.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi MZ, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms. Int Endod J 1999;32:99-102.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
AL-Zahrani MS, AL-Zahrani AG. Sodium hypochlorite accident in endodontics: An update review. Int J Dent Oral Health 2016;2. doi http:// dx.doi.org/10.16966/2378-7090.168  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Albahiti M. Knowledge and practices of decontamination during root canal treatment by dentists in Jeddah. Saudi Dent J 2020;32:213-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Stevens RH, Grossman LI. Evaluation of the antimicrobial poten-tial of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament. J Endod 1983;9:372-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, Sundqvist G. The anti-microbial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J 1991;24:119-25.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Dehghan S, Niasar AN, Kharazifard MJ. A comparison of canal preparations by Mtwo and RaCe rotary files using full sequence versus one rotary file techniques; a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Saudi Endod J 2014;4:70-6.  Back to cited text no. 28
  [Full text]  
29.
Patel S, Saunders WRadiographs in endodontics. In: Horner K, Eaton KA, editors. Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography. 3rd ed. London, UK: Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK), Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2013. p. 83-96.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Peak JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The outcome of root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal Air Force). Br Dent J 2001;190:140-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jamleh A, Alotaibi Y, Andijani A, Masuadi E, Alfouzan K, Baskaradoss JK. Recall practice among dental practitioners in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20:26-31.  Back to cited text no. 31
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed192    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded26    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal