Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 595
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 88-92

Radiographic evaluation of the quality of root canal filling performed by undergraduate students at Riyadh Elm University: A retrospective study


1 Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Endodontic Consultant, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Lecturer, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Budur Alosaimi
College of Dentistry Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_197_19

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: The aim was to assess the quality of root canal filling and the frequency of procedural errors in endodontic treatment performed by undergraduate students at Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: Radiographic record of 306 postroot canals treated anterior and posterior teeth done by female undergraduate students between 2013 and 2019 were randomly selected. The root canal filling was evaluated using the following criteria: acceptable treatment comprises the following characteristics: uniform density, no voids, root canal filling 0–2 mm from the radiographic apex, and tapered: overfilling, underfilling, and inadequate density were considered unacceptable. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 116 root canal fillings were done in the anterior teeth and 190 in the posterior teeth. In which 69.9% of root canal fillings were acceptable, and 66% of the treated teeth were in the maxilla. Patients with abscess and periapical pathology in radiograph had 2.11 times higher odds of unacceptable root canal fillings compared to patients with normal periapical radiographs, and the association was significant with 95% (confidence interval: 1.27–3.50) after adjusting for age, number of canals, tooth position, and location. About 13.7% of the unacceptable root canal fillings were underfilled. Conclusion: The quality of root canal filling performed by female undergraduates was considered acceptable. Underfilling was the mostly identified treatment error. Hence, additional preparation is needed to improve the clinical aptitudes of the undergraduates for better endodontic treatment results.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed108    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded26    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal