Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 86
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 183-188

In vitro comparative evaluation of dentinal microcracks formation during root canal preparation by different nickel-titanium file systems


1 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry, AMCMET Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
2 College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nishantkumar R Surti
B/302, Vrajdeep Apartment, Near L.G.Over Bridge, Maninagar, Ahmedabad - 380 008, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_23_17

Rights and Permissions

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare dentinal microcracks formation during root canal preparation by different commercially available nickel-titanium (NiTi) file systems. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected. All specimens were decoronated and divided into seven groups of 12 each. Teeth were mounted in the acrylic block with simulated periodontal ligaments. Twelve teeth served as a control in which no treatment was performed. Experimental groups were instrumented with Hand NiTi, ProTaper universal, ProTaper Next, Silk, WaveOne, and self-adjusting files (SAF). Roots were then sectioned 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, and the cut surface was observed under a stereomicroscope and checked for the presence or absence of dentinal microcracks. Results: SAF group and Hand NiTi group showed no cracks formation along with control group. ProTaper rotary files showed more number of cracks than ProTaper Next, Silk and WaveOne used in the study. However, no statistically significant difference was found among ProTaper rotary, ProTaper Next, Silk, and WaveOne (P > 0.05). Conclusion: All rotary files created microcracks in the root dentin at all three levels, whereas the SAF and hand files presented with satisfactory results with no dentinal microcracks.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed750    
    Printed80    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded268    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal